Ski-Doo Snowmobiles Forum banner

1 vs 2 ply tracks.

1 reading
9.9K views 11 replies 9 participants last post by  rockerdan  
#1 ·
ok so there's a bunch of threads comparing the two types of tracks but what exactly is the difference? The 2 ply is clearly much stronger but why? I've compared my 1 ply ripsaw side by side with a 2 ply rip and they are the exact same thickness so what's different?
 
#2 · (Edited by Moderator)
The rubber is thicker on the 1-ply. But the rubber adds no tensile strength. Most if not all strength comes from the woven fabric "ply" inside that rubber. Two plies = 2 layers of fabric (with rubber in between them). A two ply would be twice as strong as a 1 ply if the fabric plies were the same size/type/weave. My guess is the single ply is a bit thicker so the track would be more than half as strong as a standard 2 ply track. In other words Camoplast didn't just leave out one of the plies to create the single ply track. Just a guess.

There are usually (sometimes?) fiberglass rods that run left-right across the track where the clips are and my guess is that the rubber holds these rods in place. At least that's how my Yamaha track was constructed. Easy to see because it was falling apart.
 
#5 ·
When warm, you can manipulate a single ply with your hands easier then 2 ply...its noticeable in warm temps.

Big top speeds, and studding.....2 ply is the way. For trails, pre-studded, speeds under 120 or so single ply seem to be fine.

Really depends what your needs are, single ply does offer lesser weight, but they need to be run TIGHT because the balloon effect on big speeds is bad, and you can feel it hit your front exchanger protector.

Dan
 
#9 ·
Call Camo. I spoke to a rep when deciding to purchase another track. The reps there are easy to talk to. They will tell you all about the single-ply and two-ply tracks. It isn't as easy as saying a two-ply is twice as strong as it isn't according to Camo.