Ski-Doo Snowmobiles Forum banner

Free ride vs Backcountry

1 reading
7.1K views 16 replies 12 participants last post by  00PowderSpecial  
#1 ·
Hey, I currently have 2020 Backcountry XRS 850 2” track. By end of season I’ll have 10k kms on it. I love the sled, I have added some options to it to help it before to my liking even more for off trail. I have taken it on a few big trips with the amount of kms on it but have also rode backcountry in Gaspe bay with it. Also every trip we are always going off trail and finding deep snow, hydro lines, beaver ponds whatsoever. I really like backcountry riding but where I live it is few and far between to get a good winter locally. Usually driving 6 plus hours to get to good snow. A lot of my friends ride like me but we still like to put on maybe 200kms to make it a day when we go Quebec. Am I crazy to wanting to order the new 2024 Freeride 146 2.5”? I feel I am slowly transferring to wanting to do even more backcountry riding. But I know in order to ride my sled I need to be riding trails too because it just isn’t enough snow at times. My 2” track now is fine on the trails I just need to ride to conditions. What should I do? Get a freeride and finally say I have bought one with hopefully no regrets. Or go safe mode with G5 Backcountry 146 2.0. I even thought maybe the 154 backcountry would be better bet. But it’s just that much longer of sled in the sled trailer. Any help I’d appreciated thank you.
 
#2 ·
This is speculated by all. The real answer is its one or the other. There is no true cross over good at both things. I had a bctry xrs 154 2.0 last year. Decent on trail. I felt it lacked off trail. Now i have a 23 freeride 154 2.5. Terrible on trail. Amazing off (when its not broken :( ). The only answer here is except so so in 2 environments or ideally have 2 sleds. Ive chased this unicorn for many years and have given up. Its easy for me though as i find trails boring and annoying.

From what you are describing id stay with the backcountry
 
#3 ·
I just swapped to a 146 2.5 gen 5 freeride from a backcountry. All UP of Michigan miles. 1000 miles so far mostly trail. Its not that bad on trail. Compared to my backcountry. It doeant over heat, i swapped seats as well.

it is a way funner aled then my backcountry is. Just feels way lighter. It would be tough for me to keep up witj an mxz but i get along just fine!
 
#10 ·
No I really like my backcountry I honestly do. I just got back from revelstoke and could tell a huge difference between those two sleds and I guess that’s to be obvious. I just wonder if I can get get away with a 146 freeride trail riding a 2.5 track that when I am off trail it’ll be that much more fun. My favourite day is 4 plus feet of powder rippin beaver ponds. I know the freeride would be that much more fun.
 
#8 ·
Does it look like, for the 2024 model, Skidoo has intended to get the backcountry closer to the "gold standard 50/50 sled" many claim the Switchback Assault is? CmotionX claims relaxed torque arm angle which would theoretically have a negative impact on the sleds ability to get up on snow (as far as I understand skid suspension geometry) and the front end being RASX I believe is a more trail oriented front end?

From what I had gathered in the discussion for the new Backcountry, I figure I am going to be infinitely rebuilding my G4 BCX
 
#11 ·
If that’s th
Does it look like, for the 2024 model, Skidoo has intended to get the backcountry closer to the "gold standard 50/50 sled" many claim the Switchback Assault is? CmotionX claims relaxed torque arm angle which would theoretically have a negative impact on the sleds ability to get up on snow (as far as I understand skid suspension geometry) and the front end being RASX I believe is a more trail oriented front end?

From what I had gathered in the discussion for the new Backcountry, I figure I am going to be infinitely rebuilding my G4 BCX
If that’s the case then I would argue that the new g5 bC is 70/30 trail - off trail.
 
#14 ·
I would not sweat trail-ability of a 23+ bc. I had zero issues on trail with my skis set to narrow. I would argue the poo is closer to a 70/30 trail first sled with it’s really wide ski stance. Skis are also narrow and yes I’ve ridden one - my brothers, it is still a nice machine tho.
 
#17 ·
Lots to be considered here. Back in ‘13 I bought a Freeride 146 2.5 and from day one I said this is a true back country model, decent on trails and great off trail. Fast forward to 18 and I decided to try a 18 summit 146 2.5, threw some shocks on and it was great all around, but in the last couple seasons my wife got a 14 BCX and I was like man this thing is excellent on trail, so I was always stealing hers when snow conditions were marginal and she finally got to the point and was like why don’t you order your own and sell your summit so that’s what I did, ordered a 22 BCXRS 146x2.0 and it’s a do everything machine. I can trail ride all day yet side hill off trail and play in the powder. On the fluffiest of days, I miss the summit but that’s maybe 1% of the time, the other 99% of the time I’m happy my @ss is on the BCX. I think looking at the current lineup if I wanted to have even more off trail ability the next step would be bcxrs 154x2, then 2.5, after that you’d be in summit Sp 146 range as you would still have the longer tunnel and snow flap.

I think going Freeride 146 now, for MY24 it’s just meant for deep snow all the time and minimal trail use. I just have too much trail to ride close to home for it to be worth my while. And looking back 10 years ago, even 4 years ago, a 2020 Freeride 146 was basically a 2023 backcountry xrs the only difference was one has a 2” paddle with C motion and the other has 2.5” T motion.