Correct me if I am wrong but the 600ho is the same engine as the 500ss on the bottom end! So why would the ss have more bottom end?Adirondack said:depends. I think that ss has better low end snap but the HO has longer legs. If you were to race 600 feet I say the HO, racing a shorter distance the ss.
The SS has shorter stroke, quicker revschynax said:Correct me if I am wrong but the 600ho is the same engine as the 500ss on the bottom end! So why would the ss have more bottom end?
these 105+ mph threads on 600h.o's and 500ss's are REALLY getting old.jscott said:I don't know what may have been wrong with his 700, but he couldn't catch me & we were running flat out, WFO. My speedo said 107mph on the digi readout. He was none to happy when we got to the end of the lake. He is a riding buddy & yes we were comparing top speed-racing. I've never been impressed with the case reed 700. But I also am a die hard 670 guy. That motor rocks.
for real. I didn't realize after being out of high school for over 10 years now that they let kids play on the internet during class.fxdwg said:Next thing we are gonna hear is that an 440 smoked a new Mach Z.