Don't believe they make 'em that short yet.

 

Nope, shortest 3" is 153" length.

 

Suppose a guy could always DJ it up and make his own out of the 153".

 

Yep take 2 pitches out and it's a 147"

 

Just thinkn about a 3" 146 gives me a chubby... Haha!

 

Love my 146 and had no trouble with in in revelstoke last week but a little extra hook up never hurts

 

at what point do you say you'd rather have a 146x3 rather than a 154x2.5 or 154x3? i dont ride shorties, so maybe i am missing something.......but it seems like if you feel the need to have a 146x3, a longer sled would be better for you. not criticizing, just curious as to "why"?

 

at what point do you say you'd rather have a 146x3 rather than a 154x2.5 or 154x3? i dont ride shorties, so maybe i am missing something.......but it seems like if you feel the need to have a 146x3, a longer sled would be better for you. not criticizing, just curious as to "why"?

Don't ask why. Rather, ask why not?!

 

If the snow is that deep, wouldn't you benefit from more more floatation with a 154x2.5?

 

at what point do you say you'd rather have a 146x3 rather than a 154x2.5 or 154x3? i dont ride shorties, so maybe i am missing something.......but it seems like if you feel the need to have a 146x3, a longer sled would be better for you. not criticizing, just curious as to "why"?

So a 146 is a shorty now?

 

In "deep" snow obviously longer is better. But i consider "deep" to be 4-6ft of fresh or more... Thats why i also have a 174x3, for "deep" snow. But on those 2-3ft of fresh days, my 146 is a lot more fun than a 174 is.. And a 146x3 would have an insane amount of hook up. Compared to my 2.5", im guessing it would be pretty noticable. Talk about wheelie monster!! Id be interested in one..

 

So a 146 is a shorty now?

After buying my 174t3, i call my 146 my "shorty" haha!!

 

In "deep" snow obviously longer is better. But i consider "deep" to be 4-6ft of fresh or more... Thats why i also have a 174x3, for "deep" snow. But on those 2-3ft of fresh days, my 146 is a lot more fun than a 174 is.. And a 146x3 would have an insane amount of hook up. Compared to my 2.5", im guessing it would be pretty noticable. Talk about wheelie monster!! Id be interested in one..

Ditch the 16 wide track on your 146 and get a 144 camo extreme 2.5 lug. Its the best thing I did on my 2013.

 

I have a 146x15 peak 2.5 under it, so far i love that track. The amount of traction when the sled is on its side is unreal. Im hoping they offer a peak 3.0... Haha! That would be awesome..

 

I call my 154 a shorty. Anything less is just stubby, super stubby and WTF

 

I am pulling my interested mind out of this conversation. It seems like it's turning into a dck swinging match.

 

I talked about this last winter with a guy. I know there is little difference between a 146 and 154, but I feel like a 146x3 would be so darn nimble and fun. Perfect for UP trees

 

Then I must be super stubby stubberson...

World's only 120 x 3" (872 Power...ha haaa)

Just no fkin snow - unreal how much rain we've had in the last 6 weeks if all the rain was snow we'd have 5~6 feet right now......unreal. :mad_old:

It is not mounted in yet - im not doing any work on my sled till enough snow to ride.

 

Dude a 120x3 track is sick!! I have a 146 as well for ripping around when the T3 isn't needed! I agree a 146x3 would be awesome. Shorter, more nimble a bit more traction in the lighter and slightly deep and I would ride the sled all the time! Is there anyone who mods the tracks?

 

163/189"...hahaha

There is plenty of opportunity to make your own 146 x 3"... :ride:

 

163/189"...hahaha
There is plenty of opportunity to make your own 146 x 3"... :ride:
189-163.jpg
189 track - Copy.jpg

Didn't someone do a couple 189"ers a couple of years ago out in West Yellowstone?

 

Do it. That last half inch is the difference between "ooohhhh" and "aaahhhhhh".

 

163/189"...hahaha

There is plenty of opportunity to make your own 146 x 3"... :ride:

189-163.jpg

189 track - Copy.jpg

That will be a stock track in 2-3 years.

 

Didn't someone do a couple 189"ers a couple of years ago out in West Yellowstone?

That is Dave's 2011 x 800etec. Just waiting for him to chime in here. He must be busy.

They built 6 of them I do believe and one guy made a Polaris 210 inch if I remember correctly.

 

Why not a 3" 146. They make a 2.33" for the 137.

I remember when 1.5" lug was considered nuts.
When we got to 2.5" people thought that was it.
Now the OE's have 3" and the aftermarket has 3.25".
when will they be too big?

"Why not 6 minute abs?"