Jump to content

 





Photo

800etec What a dissappointment


  • Please log in to reply
174 replies to this topic

#151 Boddysurfer

Boddysurfer

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 933 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary AB
  • Interests:Skiing, Snowboarding, Kayaking, anything in the mountains.
  • Sled:2012 Freeride 154x2.5 with tMotion

Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:02 PM

I think what some people are forgetting to keep in mind is that ROBGROTTO spends a lot of time on the trails in northern Maine. It is unique country in that you can keep it at at full throttle for very long periods of time. He has a carbed 800 and a brand new 800 ETEC and runs both under the same conditions. I can tell you that running the sled at the limits for miles on end will bring these things to the surface and will accelerate any defects in the sled. It is fine if you don't run under the same type of conditions, but please don't make the mistake of saying these are not real issues just because you have not experienced them. If you want to rub all over you Doo naked and talk about how much your lovin' them up, then by all means feel free to start another thread. The original post was about not having the claimed 163 hp.


With all due respect, how is any of the above relevant to the original post?


We're all entitled to our opinions, why are you trying to police this thread?
Will trade any of my 2012 Gold parts for 2013 Orange parts.

Wanted Blue Xp Side Panels and Hood

Wanted 160/350 Primary Spring

PM for more info.

#152 DBer

DBer

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,202 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middle Massachusetts
  • Interests:2011 Renegade 800r Etec
    1997 Formula Z 583cc
  • Sled:2013 Renegade 800r Etec

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:52 PM

With all due respect, how is any of the above relevant to the original post?


We're all entitled to our opinions, why are you trying to police this thread?

I guess you haven't been reading the post then, as I brought it back to the original point. It turned into who has had problems and who hasn't and who is right and who is wrong. :blink:

So I guess from your statement you would agree that I am also entitled to my opinion and comments. I am also guessing you did not like my comment about rubbing all over your sled naked :roll

Geesh, people take things so seriously. It is a web board where people post their comments, good or bad, take it or leave it.

:revinmotion:
(I have added emoticons in an effort to convey a lighter tone) :Cheers

Your 800 Etec engine grenading is simply a confirmation that the 600 really would not have been the right sled for you.
I wasn't a big EPA emissions fan until I visited China.


#153 ZXMODV

ZXMODV

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ontario
  • Interests:Sledding! Skiing, boating, kart racing
  • Sled:2000mxz700, 2000zrt600,ec340, stx440

Posted 22 April 2012 - 03:24 PM

I guess you haven't been reading the post then, as I brought it back to the original point. It turned into who has had problems and who hasn't and who is right and who is wrong.

So I guess from your statement you would agree that I am also entitled to my opinion and comments. I am guessing you did not like my comment about rubbing all over your sled naked :roll

Geesh, people take things so seriously. It is a web board where people post their comments, good or bad, take it or leave it.

Ha! Bad picture about rubbing naked on the sled, DBer. I wasn't saying BRP doesn't have some issues, nor that they're dyno claims were all right. Dyno claims are often used to sell products because it wworks. Dyno claims will also be different because of production tolerances, which all mass produced engines have. If they were all hand assembled like race motors and broken in and tested for power output on a dyno, we couldn't afford them.And if you could dyno one "on the pipe" at speed on a lake,it may be more. The most power is available to any IC engine at sea level in cold air. Thats the highest amout of o2. Moving air is colder and more dense also. That why planes take off in shorter distances in the cold. Dense air. Engines just crackle at -20 F ! IMHO the rpm problems are probably from the ecu altering ignition timing and injector band width to keep the engine at a safe A/F ratio. One or more of it's inputs must require that.Exhaust stream temp is a big one when it's in "closed loop" Now, which color make the most power on the dyno, back or white?

#154 New Too Doo

New Too Doo

    Advanced Member

  • DOOCrew
  • 11,063 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Loudon, NH
  • Sled:2005 MXZ 500ss 2013 BCX 800


Posted 22 April 2012 - 04:16 PM

So ahhh...what's wrong with rubbing yourself naked all over your sled...

specially if she is brand new and all shiny and smooth

 


#155 krom

krom

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 486 posts

Posted 22 April 2012 - 06:19 PM

Running injectors above 80% duty cycle is not great. At 110% for long periods of time will cause injector to fail. You would have more motor meltdowns. I really don't think this is the problem.....



I respectfully disagree. I read once somewhere that the hp limit of these injectors is 80 hp per cylinder so at 155 ish hp the 800 E-Tec twin is at or very near the limit. And as far as meltdowns go I heard if the injectors fail they fail rich. A mechanic that works on E-Tec outboards told me this.

The injectors will continue to improve. When they first came out on the outboards there was no way they could handle the 8K rpms of a snowmobilie engine, even a 600 and now look where they are...



Fuel injectors don't have a "duty cycle". There are two design parameters that they work under: delivery volume and duration.An engineer calculates the amount of fuel required  that the engine will need to run at maximum load and heaviest condions and coldest temps.ie: theoretical 10 mile pull in heavy snow with maximum weight on the machine at high speed and bitter cold.The injector has to be able to deliver this plus a comfortable safety margin more. The rail pressure determines the pressure of the spray, and the size of the body and pintle,plus the duration determine how much.The timing and duration is  determined by the ecu, which calculates from the many inputs- throttle position, rpm, intake air temp,ambient air temp,exhaust temp and 02 in the stream,manifold pressure, barometric pressure,coolant temperature,vehicle speed, etc.Some or all of these may be used. The "map' is calculated so that the ecu controls the desired air fuel ratio under all conditions with the volume and duration of the injector "spray". And then there's the EPA!



I have to add something to my last post about fuel injection. I'm a newbie and ran out of room!lol I think I've got it figured out now. The injectors I was talking about are "port" injectors. As you all know,the etec uses the same principals, but rail pressure  could not come close to being able to spray into the enormous heat and pressure of the combustion chamber.Nor could the standard elctromagnetic coil work fast enough to move the pintle, hence the "voice coil" technology of the etec direct injection. But someone posted that the injector will fail "rich". Never heard of this. As far as i know, a failure would not deliver fuel. If someone knows anything about this, could you please explain. Also, I've been watching the discussion about etec 800 piston failures vs the practically non existent 600 rate.I think its the heavier weight of the 800 piston. All snowmobile 2 strokes are running at maximum piston speed now and have been for quite awhile.Being as how they are practically slightly detuned race engines,they have an amazing reliability rate.They can't make the piston lighter, with the need for heat removal by the crown and ring lands. And the heavier piston has more reciprocating mass to change direction.The bigger bore piston has a larger diameter of squish,farther from the ignition source and slower flame propogation because of this,which means you have to ignite it sooner,which raises the possibility of detonation.All engines with smaller pistons have better volumetric effiency. But we don't want the added weight of more cylinders anymore. I actually am very impressed that BRP and the other manufacturers can get 150-160hp out of a 50lb chunk of aluminum with a single expansion chamber that doesn't need new pistons every weekend!And take the beating they doo in terrible conditions for thousands of miles with very little maintenance.And really,they get better fuel mileage than some road vehicles!It's a great time to be a snowmobiler! I'm sure glad Walter Kaden defected from East Germany 50 years ago!


Lots of wrong info above.
I'll try and keep this simple and brief

E-tec injectors don't operate anything like conventional fuel injectors.  There are no "duty cycle" problems, and nothing ever made can run above 100% duty cycle anyway.

FWIW:

A duty cycle is the time that an entity spends in an active state as a fraction of the total time under consideration. The term is often used pertaining to electrical devices, e.g., switching power supplies.


On a conventional efi system this is when the injector is open spraying fuel. 100% duty cycle would be always open (or open 100% of the time)

E-tec injectors use a voice coil and work like a speaker, but instead of pushing a cone that moves air to make sound, they push a piston that moves fuel.

When a etec injector fails, it goes lean.  If you're lucky it completely fails and doesn't move any fuel.  This makes the engine run like crap, but doesn't melt a piston.

From what I've seen with the outboards a majority of the time they fail, they go lean, burn a piston, I call brp and they send a powerhead assy.  I have replaced a couple injectors that where noisy, or just lean enough to cause a miss at idle.

#156 ZXMODV

ZXMODV

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ontario
  • Interests:Sledding! Skiing, boating, kart racing
  • Sled:2000mxz700, 2000zrt600,ec340, stx440

Posted 22 April 2012 - 07:01 PM

Lots of wrong info above.
I'll try and keep this simple and brief

E-tec injectors don't operate anything like conventional fuel injectors. There are no "duty cycle" problems, and nothing ever made can run above 100% duty cycle anyway.

FWIW:
On a conventional efi system this is when the injector is open spraying fuel. 100% duty cycle would be always open (or open 100% of the time)

E-tec injectors use a voice coil and work like a speaker, but instead of pushing a cone that moves air to make sound, they push a piston that moves fuel.

When a etec injector fails, it goes lean. If you're lucky it completely fails and doesn't move any fuel. This makes the engine run like crap, but doesn't melt a piston.

From what I've seen with the outboards a majority of the time they fail, they go lean, burn a piston, I call brp and they send a powerhead assy. I have replaced a couple injectors that where noisy, or just lean enough to cause a miss at idle.

Those were pretty well the points I made krom. All injectors be they diesel or gas spray fuel. Port injection is low pressure.The pump provides enough rail pressure. Direct injection is high pressure. Diesel engines use a mechanical pump to deliver this. Like I and you said the etec injector pressure is produced using voice coil technology. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the duration of the delivery controls the amount of fuel sprayed.And that is controlled by the ecu based on input information.More fuel, longer spray. I don't think duty cycle has any relevance to fuel injection. An arc welder has a duty cycle. Based on percentages of time on for the output amperage.ie: at maximum output it can only run say 20% of the time and then off for 80% to cool. Hence thename"duty cycle"

#157 NHRoadking

NHRoadking

    Advanced Member

  • DOOCrew
  • 1,761 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Hampshire, USA
  • Sled:2013 Summit SP 154 E-TEC 800

Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:00 PM

So ahhh...what's wrong with rubbing yourself naked all over your sled...

specially if she is brand new and all shiny and smooth


Your summer will be a long one my friend....

#158 tic

tic

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,847 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pennsyltucky
  • Interests:stamp collecting, opera, the violin and viola
  • Sled:13/ GSX-SE 1200

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:42 PM

I just wish the 2 strokes in general had longer cycle life for all their components. This will never be due to their nature. I've owned two 600 e-tecs for 4 years and put a combined 18,000mi. on them with the only failure being a mag side coil on the TNT which didn't leave me stranded. Sadly I'll be trading these sleds in next winter and already spring ordered two 1200's for next year. I will miss the light weight, great MPG and miserly oil consumption but will not miss the fear of being left stranded by losing a crank seal or a locating pin. These fears have been growing as the miles add up, something I will not worry about with the 4-tec engines. There are far too many stories of the 800's having issues to not believe them. While many will be able to ride their 800 e-tecs for thousands of trouble free miles, others won't be so lucky. I believe the service life for the isoflex grease is just shy of 10,000mi. It's hard to justify spending 12k on a sled that you know will need an engine rebuild at or before 10,000mi. If I bought an 800 e-tec and it suffered from the dreaded rpm loss issue, I wouldn't be happy and I don't think these guys are complaining just for lack of anything else to do. I'd love to have an 800 just for the fun factor of all that HP on tap but for the slow trail riding we typically do, I think the 1200 is a better choice. BRP will continue to improve the 800 e-tec for reliability but hey, it's a 2-stroke, it's not going to last forever no matter how many safeguards are built into it. If you can get over the weight penalty of the 1200, I think the peace of mind of a 4-stroke engine is worth considering and although DI technology has saved the beloved 2-stroke for now, the industry will be moving torwards all 4 strokes in the future just like streetbikes IMHO. I hope I'm wrong because I've always loved two strokes. I'm getting old though, quiet and reliable sound better to me than brute power.
QUOTE (wreckless @ Dec 29 2009, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just because someone makes their sled loud doesn't mean trails are closing. I can make my sled as loud as i want to. I'm half tempted to run the loudest set of pipes I can just to irritate people

#159 krom

krom

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 486 posts

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:42 PM

Those were pretty well the points I made krom. All injectors be they diesel or gas spray fuel. Port injection is low pressure.The pump provides enough rail pressure. Direct injection is high pressure. Diesel engines use a mechanical pump to deliver this. Like I and you said the etec injector pressure is produced using voice coil technology. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the duration of the delivery controls the amount of fuel sprayed.And that is controlled by the ecu based on input information.More fuel, longer spray. I don't think duty cycle has any relevance to fuel injection. An arc welder has a duty cycle. Based on percentages of time on for the output amperage.ie: at maximum output it can only run say 20% of the time and then off for 80% to cool. Hence thename"duty cycle"


Sort of...


The etec injector is a mutt, part of it works like an old fashioned diesel injector with a pop off pressure (the valve wont open until the fluid pressure exceeds a minimum threshold) to get the fuel pressure up to, and above this pressure, the voice coil pushes a piston.  The longer the pulse of electricity, the more fuel is sprayed..  Just not for the same reasons as a normal injector.  There is a lot more going on.  Pulses are sent to "catch" the piston as it returns from pushing the fuel, so it doesn't make as much noise when it stops.  
Varying the voltage to the injector will also change the amount of fuel delivered    


Duty cycle is valid and relevant to any system where the injector is basically an on off valve. (pretty much every other efi system on the market, including throttle body, multi-port, orbital direct injection (opti-max), common rail direct injection (both gas and diesel) etc)
On those injectors exceeding the recommended maximum duty cycle can cause problems with the injectors, and the hardware controlling them

#160 ZXMODV

ZXMODV

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ontario
  • Interests:Sledding! Skiing, boating, kart racing
  • Sled:2000mxz700, 2000zrt600,ec340, stx440

Posted 22 April 2012 - 10:07 PM

Sort of...


The etec injector is a mutt, part of it works like an old fashioned diesel injector with a pop off pressure (the valve wont open until the fluid pressure exceeds a minimum threshold) to get the fuel pressure up to, and above this pressure, the voice coil pushes a piston. The longer the pulse of electricity, the more fuel is sprayed.. Just not for the same reasons as a normal injector. There is a lot more going on. Pulses are sent to "catch" the piston as it returns from pushing the fuel, so it doesn't make as much noise when it stops.
Varying the voltage to the injector will also change the amount of fuel delivered


Duty cycle is valid and relevant to any system where the injector is basically an on off valve. (pretty much every other efi system on the market, including throttle body, multi-port, orbital direct injection (opti-max), common rail direct injection (both gas and diesel) etc)
On those injectors exceeding the recommended maximum duty cycle can cause problems with the injectors, and the hardware controlling them

Interesting krom. I'll agree to disagree about the duty cycle thing.lol. Some questions for you: What form of voltage is used to fire the piston? AC or DC? How much? And is it produced by a dedicated winding in the stator and controlled by a low voltage from the ecu? And is it a constant voltage to produce a certain pressure or variable to increase the injector pressure according to rpm and combustion chamber pressure?

#161 doodave

doodave

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 258 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:60126
  • Sled:04 800 Rev

Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:53 AM

I think what some people are forgetting to keep in mind is that ROBGROTTO spends a lot of time on the trails in northern Maine. It is unique country in that you can keep it at at full throttle for very long periods of time. He has a carbed 800 and a brand new 800 ETEC and runs both under the same conditions. I can tell you that running the sled at the limits for miles on end will bring these things to the surface and will accelerate any defects in the sled. It is fine if you don't run under the same type of conditions, but please don't make the mistake of saying these are not real issues just because you have not experienced them. If you want to rub all over you Doo naked and talk about how much your lovin' them up, then by all means feel free to start another thread. The original post was about not having the claimed 163 hp.



Thank you

#162 New Too Doo

New Too Doo

    Advanced Member

  • DOOCrew
  • 11,063 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Loudon, NH
  • Sled:2005 MXZ 500ss 2013 BCX 800


Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:58 AM

Your summer will be a long one my friend....


Your not kidding.

Way too much technical mumbo jumbo in this thread for me...



 


#163 ZXMODV

ZXMODV

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ontario
  • Interests:Sledding! Skiing, boating, kart racing
  • Sled:2000mxz700, 2000zrt600,ec340, stx440

Posted 23 April 2012 - 11:29 AM

Sorry if anyone thought I was hijacking this thread.I feel that the more knowledge one has, the better chance of understanding a problem and coming to a solution. If nothing else it gives you the capability to understand what someone more technically savvy is saying when you take it in for a repair or upgrade.And there seems to be some pretty knowledgeable people on here.There's always something to learn from someone else. And dber, I think NHroadking was talking about you when he said it will be a long summer for you!lol The naked thing! Yup, it will be a long summer. It snowed here last night.

#164 DBer

DBer

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,202 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middle Massachusetts
  • Interests:2011 Renegade 800r Etec
    1997 Formula Z 583cc
  • Sled:2013 Renegade 800r Etec

Posted 23 April 2012 - 12:37 PM

What happens in the trailer, stays in the trailer.

Agreed, the more info the better. Plus I want to see how long this thread will go on...

Your 800 Etec engine grenading is simply a confirmation that the 600 really would not have been the right sled for you.
I wasn't a big EPA emissions fan until I visited China.


#165 ZXMODV

ZXMODV

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ontario
  • Interests:Sledding! Skiing, boating, kart racing
  • Sled:2000mxz700, 2000zrt600,ec340, stx440

Posted 23 April 2012 - 01:28 PM

What happens in the trailer, stays in the trailer.

Agreed, the more info the better. Plus I want to see how long this thread will go on...

For sure on the trailer thing! Question: In your experience, is the rpm drop issue always at wide open throttle? after a long run? in any particular temps or random? does it ever do it during corner to corner acceleration? Does it happen in low snow conditions or when theres lots of snow for cooling? What does the bum dyno tell you when it happens?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users