Exhaust Temp sensor bypass
#1
Posted 26 June 2011 - 07:20 PM
Sleds that I have loved and lost (and made a few bucks on hopefully).
1985 Formula Plus 521, 1994 Polaris XLT 580, 1976? Sno-Jet 440, 1993 Polaris Storm 750
2004 GSX 800 Limited, 2005 Mach Z 1000, 2004 MXZ X 800, 2000 MXZ 700, 2006 MXZ 800 (X 2)
2006 MXZ X 800, 1999 Polaris Indy XCF 440, 2006 GSX 600 SDI (X 2), 2007 MXZ X 600 SDI
2009 MXZ X 800R, 2007 Mach Z 1000
#2
Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:10 PM
While we wait for snow. Hoping for a little knowledgeable feedback on replacing the $250.00 exhaust temperature sensor and inserting a resistor. I had done it on my '05 Mach Z but only had a chance for a couple rides (150 miles) before a season ending melt down. I had installed a 230 ohm resistor to match what the value was on a good e.t.s. i had laying around. That was a room temperature resistance reading and was wondering if that was a fatal error on my part since exhaust temps would be much higher when riding her. I hear of guys tying them up out of the way and never having a problem.
See the second chart on the attached thread.
Bluemax - Sensor Resistance Charts
#3
Posted 27 June 2011 - 08:10 AM
Let me ask you this question and you can make your own decision. If you spend $250 on a new EGT (Exhaust Temperature Sensor) and tie it to the frame, what temp is the sensor going to read. Basically ambient air temp. Your 230 ohm resistor should work as well as installing a new sensor and tying to frame. The EGT is only used as a high limit and does not adjust any mapping until this temp is reached. Skidoo added this sensor to eliminate the chance of a muffler fire which happened to a few owners. The fires were actually a lot more prevalent in the 1000 SDI Renegades.
I wish Skidoo would have added a light that would let an owner know when the sled was in a protection mode. I think one of the biggest problems is many owners ran their sleds in a protection mode for extended periods without knowing and were running them way too lean on fuel/oil ratio. The ECU does not compensate oil injection for the protection modes. In some of the protection modes, the performance does not suffer that much but you do end up running the engine too lean on oil.
#4
Posted 27 June 2011 - 06:54 PM
Sleds that I have loved and lost (and made a few bucks on hopefully).
1985 Formula Plus 521, 1994 Polaris XLT 580, 1976? Sno-Jet 440, 1993 Polaris Storm 750
2004 GSX 800 Limited, 2005 Mach Z 1000, 2004 MXZ X 800, 2000 MXZ 700, 2006 MXZ 800 (X 2)
2006 MXZ X 800, 1999 Polaris Indy XCF 440, 2006 GSX 600 SDI (X 2), 2007 MXZ X 600 SDI
2009 MXZ X 800R, 2007 Mach Z 1000
#5
Posted 06 July 2011 - 03:32 PM
Knowing now that it is a high temp trigger only, I am comfortable assuming the bypass wasn't the problem. Yes tying it up out of the way will only feed it ambient temp.. I just didn't want to be a test bed for disaster.
The EGT sensor will pickup a lean burn happening...ie bad injector...or low pressure pump going bad....when it picks up to much heat your temp light will flash along with a beeps if u can hear the beeps or see the light,IMO get one cause you need a fat walet if they go down......
If u need one PM me I have a couple of good USED ones $50 plus ship
#6
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:29 PM
The EGT sensor will pickup a lean burn happening...ie bad injector...or low pressure pump going bad....when it picks up to much heat your temp light will flash along with a beeps if u can hear the beeps or see the light,IMO get one cause you need a fat walet if they go down......
If u need one PM me I have a couple of good USED ones $50 plus ship
Hi. Old topic but thought I'd ask anyway. I just bought a 2006 Ski Doo Summit 600 HO SDI 146" and it needs an exhaust temperature sensor. Just wondering if you have a good used one. Thanks.
#7
Posted 19 December 2011 - 09:58 PM
Hi. Old topic but thought I'd ask anyway. I just bought a 2006 Ski Doo Summit 600 HO SDI 146" and it needs an exhaust temperature sensor. Just wondering if you have a good used one. Thanks.
no such thing as a "good used one" I am rocking 15,000 plus miles on a 230 ohm resistor...no problems....
Skidoojunky's Mach Z orphanage.....providing a happy healthy home to super clean, rare or limited production Mach Z's
2005 Mach Z sn: 001
2001 Mach Z Yellow Tech Plus
2000 Mach Z Millennium sn: 012
2000 Mach Z Millennium sn: 134
2000 Mach Z Millennium sn: 099
2000 Mach Z Millennium sn: 050
2000 Mach Z Millennium sn: 076
2000 Mach Z Millennium sn: 077
2000 MXZ 700 Millennium Sn:372
1999 Mach Z Mike Houle sn: 289
1999 Mach Z Mike Houle sn: 077
1995.5 Formula III 600
1994 Mach Z
1993 Mach Z sn 126
1993 Plus X
1980 Citation SS ( my first sled..yep still have it)
1999 Mini Mach Z (sons)
1999 Mini Mach Z (daughters)
#8
Posted 20 December 2011 - 07:18 PM
The way I understood it was Limp mode will show light a CEL and show up in the buds. Blue- help. lol.
#9
Posted 20 December 2011 - 08:59 PM
So I take it to the dealer and they put it on the buds and say "nothing is wrong" I say reload it and I take to the lake and it runs 126+ again.
The CEL light has never light on my sled put it sure as heck has layed down.
Since the 07 map has been installed this has never happened,
So that being said, taking any sensor out of the equation is a plus, and in reality by the time the sled see's the egt if there was a real problem it would be too late anyway.
So put a resistor in it and be done with it.
#10
Posted 20 December 2011 - 09:33 PM
I'm sure blue will dispute this but I have run to it many times where I was at the lake running radar and the sled will lay down and run 120 mph all day long, after running one 126 or 127 run.
So I take it to the dealer and they put it on the buds and say "nothing is wrong" I say reload it and I take to the lake and it runs 126+ again.
The CEL light has never light on my sled put it sure as heck has layed down.
Since the 07 map has been installed this has never happened,
So that being said, taking any sensor out of the equation is a plus, and in reality by the time the sled see's the egt if there was a real problem it would be too late anyway.
So put a resistor in it and be done with it.
Agreed 100%....My ECM has been cleared of all unnecessary sensors. Here is something else to consider on these Machs - if you're E-Raves do not open properly, full throttle creates tremendous heat in the cylinder and can cause a meltdown. Sadly I experienced this first hand.
Cliff
#11
Posted 20 December 2011 - 10:40 PM
I'm sure blue will dispute this but I have run to it many times where I was at the lake running radar and the sled will lay down and run 120 mph all day long, after running one 126 or 127 run.
So I take it to the dealer and they put it on the buds and say "nothing is wrong" I say reload it and I take to the lake and it runs 126+ again.
The CEL light has never light on my sled put it sure as heck has layed down.
Since the 07 map has been installed this has never happened,
So that being said, taking any sensor out of the equation is a plus, and in reality by the time the sled see's the egt if there was a real problem it would be too late anyway.
So put a resistor in it and be done with it.
No dispute here. I believe your findings. Which map were you running when you lost top speed? I am sure you said before but I don't remember.
#12
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:00 PM
No dispute here. I believe your findings. Which map were you running when you lost top speed? I am sure you said before but I don't remember.
I tired 05-06-06.5 and had very similar results with all, once I got the 07 map the issue ended and it ran with in 1 mph every time out, normaly 126.5 to 127.5 in trail form.
Not sure why, as I know there are guys that could make that 05 map rock, I'm wondering if it had something to do with the LONG pulls it took to run over 2000'???
#13
Posted 21 December 2011 - 07:40 AM
I tired 05-06-06.5 and had very similar results with all, once I got the 07 map the issue ended and it ran with in 1 mph every time out, normaly 126.5 to 127.5 in trail form.
Not sure why, as I know there are guys that could make that 05 map rock, I'm wondering if it had something to do with the LONG pulls it took to run over 2000'???
Go figure. If BRP would have given out more information on how the protection modes worked, all of these issues would have been easier to address.
#14
Posted 22 December 2011 - 02:21 PM
#15
Posted 23 December 2011 - 10:40 AM
no such thing as a "good used one" I am rocking 15,000 plus miles on a 230 ohm resistor...no problems....
Thanks but I'm not really sure how that is done to be honest. Someone would have to explain the process in Laymans terms.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











