QUOTE (TJ500 @ Oct 1 2009, 03:10 PM)

Frostbit..
which early models/years Tundras are you referring to as superior "light/reliable/work/deep/gas sipping" sleds to todays Tundra LT 550F?...
I'm a little hesitant with a 300cc as our lakes are often slushy and HP is frequently needed... The Bravo would be a very good choice except for slush.... I am open to suggestions however as a good "light/reliable/work/deep/gas sipping" bush sled is needed....
If I can find one of the earlier Tundras in good shape, I might give it a try... tj
I didn't say anything about any older Tundra being "superior" to a 2010 Tundra 550.
What I did elude to is the new 550 Tundra has two things folks may not want: The 550 motor (for its poor fuel economy), and two, a price at least a couple grand more.
The 300F gave folks great fuel mileage (again, plug into your calculator gas at $7 a gallon) and did the job it was designed to do quite admirably, namely, tow a load, float in the deep snow, remain easy to dig out when stuck.
Bottom line, not having the smaller motor and light weight PLUS a lower cost is a boner.
At the very least, give the perspective buyer a choice. Right now you can have any Tundra you want, but it won't be inexpensive, won't get good mileage, won't be lighter than your old one.
There probably will be many happy new Tundra 550 owners. But there's probably just as many unhappy old Tundra owners, ones that wanted to buy a new one but now are on the fence.
The Yamaha Bravo goes TOO far back in time for me, but I know of a few running around Alaska traplines that you couldn't pry out of their owners hands. The same will be for any pre-2010 Tundra.