Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> powder upgrade, best upgrades for powder riding
freedomrider
post Nov 5 2009, 12:37 AM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 4-April 09
Member No.: 72407
Sled:1996 summit 670



Hello thanks for reading. I have a 1996 summit 670 136" x 1.25" track. The motor has been rebuilt and everything on the sled is stock. My local riding is mostly heavy powder snow with no groomed trails and not many snowmobilers at all. So pretty much everytime I go out its either me or my friend, with the same sled, breaking trail. It does okay but not so well in the deeper powder, over a foot. My question is whether uprgades such as skiis and clutching and whatnot are going to be enough or am I just going to want to get a track extension. The reason I ask is because my rear arm needs parts and I'm wondering if I should fix it or just do the track extension. What do you think? Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tocool4u2
post Nov 5 2009, 06:28 AM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 23-October 09
From: Montana
Member No.: 76393
Sled:2002&2003 HM 800 HO 2007 Apex turbo



QUOTE (freedomrider @ Nov 4 2009, 10:37 PM) *
Hello thanks for reading. I have a 1996 summit 670 136" x 1.25" track. The motor has been rebuilt and everything on the sled is stock. My local riding is mostly heavy powder snow with no groomed trails and not many snowmobilers at all. So pretty much everytime I go out its either me or my friend, with the same sled, breaking trail. It does okay but not so well in the deeper powder, over a foot. My question is whether uprgades such as skiis and clutching and whatnot are going to be enough or am I just going to want to get a track extension. The reason I ask is because my rear arm needs parts and I'm wondering if I should fix it or just do the track extension. What do you think? Thanks


IMO I would go to 144 and 2" paddle and change your skis to simmons they hold the front end up alot better then stock skis. One of are ridding buddies here in MT has a 95 670 and this is what we did to his and he keeps up with us just fine in 3ft plus powder
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freedomrider
post Nov 6 2009, 01:09 AM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 4-April 09
Member No.: 72407
Sled:1996 summit 670



QUOTE (tocool4u2 @ Nov 5 2009, 03:28 AM) *
IMO I would go to 144 and 2" paddle and change your skis to simmons they hold the front end up alot better then stock skis. One of are ridding buddies here in MT has a 95 670 and this is what we did to his and he keeps up with us just fine in 3ft plus powder


Thanks for your input! Good to know.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alberta Boy
post Nov 6 2009, 09:01 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 26-May 08
From: Moved to Toronto!!!
Member No.: 54226
Sled:2003 Summit RKT 827 MOD 151"



QUOTE (freedomrider @ Nov 6 2009, 12:09 AM) *
Thanks for your input! Good to know.


Track, track and track... that is your answer... 1.25" will never be good in powder... if you want to stick with a 136", buy a 2" lug track... that will help quite a bit... if you have more money, go at least 144 or 151" with rail and tunnel extensions and get skis... I personally like SLP powder pros but then again, I only ride in the mountains where the chowder is at least armpit deep! Simmons would be a good choice for your riding but not mandatory for floatation... with the new track, your ski will be 6" off the ground when you are on the throttle!


--------------------
2003 RKT 827 Summit 151"- Blacked out -"Stealth"
Dynoport pipe and can, BOSS Seat, Team secondary, Vforce III reeds, Marvin Shaw nitrogen shocks, SLP Powder Pro skis, some powder coating and some BLING!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freedomrider
post Nov 15 2009, 04:03 AM
Post #5


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 4-April 09
Member No.: 72407
Sled:1996 summit 670



QUOTE (Alberta Boy @ Nov 6 2009, 06:01 AM) *
Track, track and track... that is your answer... 1.25" will never be good in powder... if you want to stick with a 136", buy a 2" lug track... that will help quite a bit... if you have more money, go at least 144 or 151" with rail and tunnel extensions and get skis... I personally like SLP powder pros but then again, I only ride in the mountains where the chowder is at least armpit deep! Simmons would be a good choice for your riding but not mandatory for floatation... with the new track, your ski will be 6" off the ground when you are on the throttle!



Right on! Thanks for the tips!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freedomrider
post Nov 15 2009, 04:03 AM
Post #6


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 4-April 09
Member No.: 72407
Sled:1996 summit 670



QUOTE (Alberta Boy @ Nov 6 2009, 06:01 AM) *
Track, track and track... that is your answer... 1.25" will never be good in powder... if you want to stick with a 136", buy a 2" lug track... that will help quite a bit... if you have more money, go at least 144 or 151" with rail and tunnel extensions and get skis... I personally like SLP powder pros but then again, I only ride in the mountains where the chowder is at least armpit deep! Simmons would be a good choice for your riding but not mandatory for floatation... with the new track, your ski will be 6" off the ground when you are on the throttle!



Right on! Thanks for the tips!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 











RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 05:01 AM

  forums  |   mobile forums  |   gallery  |   sponsors  |   store  |   contact us 

All Ski-Doo ~ All The Time
  ©2002 - 2009 DOOTalk, LLC