Tried something different with alignment looking for some feedback or theory
#1
Posted 15 January 2008 - 12:50 AM
I have read a quite a few threads about guys moving the engine rearward and in to help compensate for the clutch alignment problem. As I loosened the three mounts (two fronts and the rear left) I got to thinking that when you move it rearward and in you are decreasing the center to center distance and also that will be increased even further when the engine is twisting under load. I got our a straight edge and set it across the primary clutch and compared it to the seconday and found that they were not square and would be even worse when the engine twists.
I decided to move the engine forward and out , by doing this I have nearly squared the clutches to each other and have increased the center to center distance to help with the belt deflection. Now by doing this I have possible put the clutches out of alignment more, but I cannot tell for sure but I am hoping that the twist of the engine will bring them into alignment and be closer to square than thery ever were.
The belt looks to sit in the clutches better and seems to more a natural curve to it instead of a curve with a twist. I also removed the torque stop and installed two o-rings under each of the two positioning studs to tightened the gap between the mount and the stop to help prevent any excessive engine twisting.
I will be riding this wednesday with stock clutching to see what happens, worse case scenerio is that I blow a belt right away and BRP buys me a new one so I really have nothing to loose. It is easy to put back to the way it was shipped and only takes about a half hour to do this.
What do you guys think? I think it will decrease heat from less deflection under load and the alignment thing I am not to worried about because it is not too bad compared to stock, but the belt is definately tighter.
-Frog
waiting for-2008 Xp 154X-awesomer sled (hopefully)
#2
Posted 15 January 2008 - 02:07 AM
no disrespect intended Frog...
sorry, rant over....
#3
Posted 15 January 2008 - 02:38 AM
Member of the 2008 post-production XP R&D Team
#4
Posted 15 January 2008 - 04:41 AM
#5
Posted 15 January 2008 - 06:51 AM
- “Z” Distance was 19.35 should be 21mm
- “X” Offset was 33mm should be 37.1mm
- “X-Y Difference was .75mm should be 1.62mm
- Loosened all motor mount bolts 6-10mm head & 3-13mm head (wrench size)
- Installed torque stop I made from rubber mounting feet I had laying around. (Cut male end off mount)
- Milled some off the top of stock torque stop (the one that is mounted with 3 bolts) so the top bolt would thread into female part of side torque mount I made.
- Removed shim under front motor mount, moved motor around till everything looked good & tightened everything down and rechecked alignment, I did this several times before I was happy.
- Cleaned sticky pins & arm bushings.
- Installed 415 ramps & added another 12mm set screw weighed & balanced arms so they were the same.
With good alignment and my vents I could leave my hands on my clutches after several hard long pulls up a steep hill.
Here are some photos:
Attached File(s)
-
dirty_pins___arm_bushings.jpg (17.62K)
Number of downloads: 8 -
Rubber_Torque_stop.jpg (31.25K)
Number of downloads: 13 -
Rubber_mount.jpg (9.5K)
Number of downloads: 8 -
numbered_arms.jpg (22.17K)
Number of downloads: 8
#6
Posted 15 January 2008 - 08:26 AM
#8
Posted 15 January 2008 - 10:20 AM
06 RMK 600
156 camo, big wheels, extros, SLP pipe & can, high flow box,
geared & clutched.
04 Gade Project Sled, BJ motor, all white w/blue accents.
150x16x2.5 camo extreme plus bunch of stuff
This yrs shop projects:
76 RV TNT 340 resto to OEM
78 RV Bliz 6500+ resto to vintage drag sled.
79 RV Bliz 7500+ complete "museum" resto in process
76 Rupp Magnum - Lightening up & gonna be a very "Pretty" drag racer.
77 Sonic - Sitting in the corner, basically a parts sled @ this point.
80 Super Sonic Going to clone a 79 Super Sonic with it as I can't find one.
Looking for 79 Moto Ski Super Sonic RV.
#9
Posted 15 January 2008 - 10:45 AM
no disrespect intended Frog...
sorry, rant over....
No problem, but I do not carry a camera with me every place I go. When I did this it was kind of a unplanned thing. I agree with pics but I do not have any. Sorry.
-Frog
waiting for-2008 Xp 154X-awesomer sled (hopefully)
#10
Posted 15 January 2008 - 11:03 AM
Yes it should, I just wanted it done so I did it!! Dealer mechanic told me there is nothing wrong with my alignment!! So I didn’t even waist my time taking it to them!!
#11
Posted 15 January 2008 - 11:16 PM
Yes, it SHOULD. But I don't expect dealers to make any adjustments, since the official word is that there isn't any alignment adjustment possible on these sleds. When I took my sled in after my first belt blew, I was told that my alignment checked out OK, even though there was an obvious dogleg in the belt between the clutches. After a few new belts and no update from BRP, I decided that I needed to look at adjusting it myself...
Member of the 2008 post-production XP R&D Team
#12
Posted 17 January 2008 - 10:30 AM
TTT
#13
Posted 20 January 2008 - 12:59 PM
-Frog
waiting for-2008 Xp 154X-awesomer sled (hopefully)
#14
Posted 20 January 2008 - 01:09 PM
Member of the 2008 post-production XP R&D Team
#15
Posted 20 January 2008 - 01:10 PM
-Frog
sounds like a good trip !!!! you made 600 miles on your last belt i dont think id be talking about this if i could get that??? that about what i get a year
your gear down / pin weight helped you going with a 20 top not bad pulls pretty hard i bet

Help





















